|
|
|
Thoughts and questions from an Aussie
[Friends, neighbors and fellow Dogs, your friendly neighborhood webmaster finds himself on the horns of a dilemma. Once again the only Dog in the pack who has never worn an American uniform has chosen to post comments on the site that do not by any stretch reflect the attitudes of the majority of the pack, and has even chosen to end his post with a statement indicating that he fully expects others within the pack to be offended by what he wrote. Your friendly neighborhood webmaster, who has been justifiably criticized in the past for making and implementing some somewhat imperious decisions about the site has resisted the temptation, for now at least, to simply remove the offending post. Pending discussions within the pack and a ruling from our duly elected Chief Operating Dog the post will remain on the site. Your somewhat imperious, still, and not always so friendly neighborhood webmaster, however, will not allow it to remain on the site without a preceding note (this paragraph) stating that it does not reflect the views of the pack or the webmaster. --- Bill Faith] *** [Further thoughts from the webmaster in an attempt to prevent future confusion: Your sometimes not so friendly neighborhood webmaster has been guilty in the past of being somewhat dictatorial about the design and content of this site and has promised the pack to try to be less so in the future. That promise aside, there are limits to your sometimes not so friendly neighborhood webmaster's patience and tolerance. Your sometimes not so friendly neighborhood webmaster is a Viet Nam veteran, as are a majority of the Dogs in the pack. Your sometimes not so friendly neighborhood webmaster in particular, as were some of the other Dogs, was still in uniform when one William Jefferson Clinton was in Moscow making nice with the enemy, and when one John Forbes Kerry was slandering our troops in Viet Nam in front of the U. S. Congress. Your sometimes dictatorial when he's pissed enough neighborhood webmaster hosts an unabashedly anti-Clinton, anti-Kerry, anti-Fonda, anti-Murtha, anti-jihadi, anti-moonbat, pro-America, pro-troops, and pro-veteran blog. Any Dog who has a problem with that is welcome to leave now before things get any uglier. Cheers, y'all.] *** [Martin Andrew has submitted his resignation from the pack and your sometimes not so friendly neighborhood webmaster, having had a good meal, a brief nap, and some time to cool off, has removed two paragraphs that were here earlier.] When I as at the Harvard University's 'Undermining Terrorism' conference in May 2002 (how's that for name dropping) there was an occassion where I found the old 'I will fight to the last drop of your blood', stil being sprounted and the latest Doonesbury cartoon puts it even more effectively. I love that sort of attitude which seems to be quite prevelant - let sonmeone else do the dirty work and it is not new - ask uncle Karl (Marx) as he wrote about it and there were grumblings going back to the in the US Civil war on the Northern side about rich industrialists not getting their sons draftyd and the families getting fat on contracts. Secondly, and more importantly whats wrong with having Hillary Clinton as the next President? Granted that Bill Clinton was seen by many Aussie's as a larrikin (loveable rogue - think Paul Hogan) and that Hillary in her university days looked more manly than Bill, most Aussies appear to genuinely like them both. Hell I'd vote fro Bill just on his record with Monica and his appetite for food. and she looks like a babe when compared to New Zealand's Helen Clark Brrrrrrrrrrrrrr. My thoughts anyway and all I can say for my final word is 'Incoming!' |
|
Contributed by Martin Andrew on November 22, 2006 at 04:51 AM in , | | | |
|
|
|
Combat Shotguns in Malaysia
During the Malayan Emergency the chance of a kill by weapon in very thick jungle, was during an ambush: Bren light machine gun, shotgun, M1/M2 carbine,no. 5 SMLE rifle, then the Sten/Owen sub-machine gun . Conversely during a chance encounter on a patrol it was the M-1/M-2 carbine, No. 5 rifle, shotgun, Bren LMG and the Sten/Owen SMG During trials, and on operations shotguns produced more hits per exposure than any other weapons in patrol and surprise close quarter actions. The wounding effect of multiple hits by SG buckshot was very effective. The No.5 SMLE rifle was bolt actioned but the effect of a .303-inch, or alternatively a 7.62 mm round from an SLR/M14/G-3, was such that the terrorist was knocked down and finished off with another shot. The Bren LMG, or any machine gun for that matter, was the best weapon when preparing an ambush, providing a large amount of firepower and giving fire superiority. In the Malaysian Confrontation the Royal Air Force flew Whirlwind helicopters out of Labuan on missions along the border with Kalimantan, Indonesia. The side door is on the right hand side, which is also the pilot's side. This meant that the left hand side of the helicopter was a dead zone as suppressive fire went. To remedy this a person usually interested in shooting, it was not a dedicated gunner, flew in the left hand cockpit seat and shot out through the window. The usual weapon was a Remington 870 but the preferred weapon was the Browning A5 borrowed from the New Zealand Special Air Service, who had removed the sear. This gave a full auto shotgun that was fired sideways so that the dispersion went sideways, due to recoil the weapon shot upwards on full auto. Shotguns were also fired sideways so that the empty cases did not end up on the floor jamming the rudder pedals. The rounds themselves were zinc cased tropical ammunition and were from Fabrique Nationale (FN). The use of zinc-covered rounds was necessitated by the paper cartridge cases, common at the time, swelling up ane then being unable to feed causing a jam. Paper cartridges causing jams due to swelling had been a problem since the First World War, and were only cured by using metal cases. FN produced at least three types of 12gauge zinc shotgun cased rounds. Two had a case length of 59mm (2.3 inches) for use in shotguns with a 2.5inch chamber but the other was only 49mm (1.9 inches) long. All have the head stamp 12-FN-12. They are all have a brass stub with a cardboard case that is covered by a zinc sleeve. The first one has a khaki cardboard case with a yellow wad. It has four SG lead buckshot over 28 B lead shot – the combination load developed for use in the Malayan Emergency. The other 59mm round has a blue cardboard case containing nine 00 lead buckshot. The 49mm round has the zinc rolled crimped over the cardboard case with a big yellow wad and contains number 4 shot. The 49mm case round is designed for 12 gauge shotguns with a 2-inch chamber. Twelve gauge shotguns with a two-inch chamber were designed for people who couldn’t handle the recoil of full 12 gauge shotgun loads. Two English gun makers that made double-barrelled shotguns for this cartridge were Purdy and Cogswell and Harrison. |
|
Contributed by Martin Andrew on October 21, 2006 at 12:31 PM in | | | |
|
Use Enough Gun
In Malaya the British trials and operational experience showed that 9mm and 0.30 calibre rounds had poor penetration of foliage. Shotguns up to 50 metres and weapons using 303in ammunition were better in this respect and gave a better chance of an incapacitating wound. In Vietnam the Australian Army infantry quickly replaced the Owen submachine gun with M-16 assault rifle. The M-16 combined the weight and handiness of the M-1/M-2 carbine and greater firepower using the 5.56 x 45mm round, which is far more powerful than the .30-inch carbine round, giving a better chance of incapacitation but the light round was easily deflected by foliage when compared to the full power 7.62 x 51mm round used on the standard L1A1 self-loading rifle (SLR). This could penetrate a 20cm tree and hit the target behind it Currently, the M16A2 rifle and M4 carbine, both in 5.56mm NATO (5.56 x 45mm), are the standard assault rifles in the US Military, generally the M-4 is the standard issue weapon in the Special Forces and the M16 in infantry and other units. This means that the infantry soldier has a greater chance in hitting a fleeting target in the jungle and in urban conflict compared to larger rifles in 7.62mm NATO (7.62 x 51mm). What has been lost is the power to penetrate through material such as foliage, and harder material like rock, brick and trees, especially as there is no longer a section 7.62mm machine gun. The following will stop a 5.56mm round fired at less than 50 metres: One thickness of well-packed sandbags; a five centimetre concrete wall (non-reinforced); a 55-gallon drum filled with water or sand, a small ammunition box filled with sand; a cinder block filled with sand (block will probably shatter); a plate glass windowpane at a 45-degree angle (glass fragments may be thrown behind the glass), a brick veneer or a car body (5.56-mm rounds penetrate but may not always exit). By comparison a single 7.62mm NATO ball round at 200m will penetrate 103cm of pine board, 17.5cm of loose sand, 20cm of cinder block and 5cm of concrete. Thus weapons using 7.62mm have better penetrating capability than ones in 5.56mm. 7.62mm NATO machine guns will ‘chew up, many types of protection affording little cover to the personnel behind them, that would be proof against 5.56mm weapons. This is the conclusion the Russian Army came to after evaluating its experiences in Chechnya and Dagetsan. Russian soldiers are to be reequipped with small arms in 7.62 x 39mm and 7.62 x 54mm, consigning the 5.45mm weapons that originally replaced them back to store. The 7.62x39mm M43 round is not as powerful as the 7.62mm NATO round but is still better at penetrating light cover than the 5.45mm round. In an article titled, Who “Blinded” the Infantry, which is from a larger piece about the findings of a conference about the Russian Army’s performance in Chechnya and Dagestan in 1999 and 2000, Lieutenant Colonel Aleksey Ionov wrote: Small Arms remain the primary, and frequently the only, means of combating the enemy at close range. As a whole they have validated their high qualities: effectiveness, reliability and ease of servicing. At this time there are shortcomings in some models, as well in with the entire family of small arms. The most glaring of these – deficiencies in the means to mount optical and night sights, the lack of organic heavy calibre weapons in combined arms subunits, and the insufficient effectiveness of firing from 5.45mm calibre weapons at troops behind light protection, the serious problem of discovery caused by firing hand-held antitank weapons, and the low power of the RGO defensive and RGN offensive hand grenades. This is not a new phenomenon. The Australian Imperial Force in a 1919 report on the use of hand grenades in the last nine months of the First World War, commented that the Number 34 egg –grenade ‘is unsatisfactory on account of the fuse being too long, also it has little effect’. The Number 34 grenade weighed 340gm and the segmented Number 36 Mills Grenade was over double the weight at 709gm. Further the Russian soldiers in Chechnya called for the replacement of the 5.45 mm RPK light machine gun with the full power 7.62 mm PK series general-purpose machine guns. The Russian soldiers were high in their praise for many of their small arms, which used larger calibre ammunition, such as the 7.62mm AKM assault rifle, the 7.62mm SVD sniping rifle, the GP-25 40 mm under barrel grenade launcher, the Pecheng machine gun, which is a modernised PKM machine gun, and the Vzlomshchik 12.7 mm heavy calibre sniper rifle. The Pecheng has a heavier fixed ribbed barrel in a metal sleeve which forces air over the barrel to keep it cool. It has 80 percent commonality with the PKM, with a more robust bipod at the muzzle and no hot air interfering with the sight picture, the dispersion is reduced by 1.9 times with the bipod and 1.7 times on a tripod compared to the PKM. |
|
Contributed by Martin Andrew on October 21, 2006 at 12:14 PM in | | | |
|
|
|
Vale Jingcha
Vale Jingcha - Obituary for a Dear Friend On 14 September my dear friend Professor Frederic Wakeman Jr passed away from cancer. Although we had not corresponded for a couple of years he will be deeply missed. I knew Fred from his work on the Shanghai Municipal Police and he was a referee for my sojourn to Harvard in 2002. Fred was from the ‘Ernest Hemingway School of Hairy Chested Writing.’ An accomplished martial artist, he had a habit of turning up in unusual places throughout his life. He was involved in underground martial arts competitions in Taiwan and the odd pub brawl in London. As for his career prior to his becoming an academic, his book on Dai Li, the Chinese Spymaster was written with a working knowledge on this type of work. His back injury was initially caused when he carried a back pack around the jungles of a South East nation in 1960. Fred ended up in a wheelchair from surgery to reduce his pain which left him with a gammy left leg. He told me not to have surgery on my back and that is the reason I have not done it to this day. All I can say is raise a glass in his honour- Vale Jingcha. |
|
Contributed by Martin Andrew on October 6, 2006 at 06:39 AM in , | | | |
|
|
|
Supporting the Lebanese Army
I believe that the Lebanese Army with their show room condition M-113 mobile coffins er.. APCs should be rearmed with state of the art weapons and be given the task of removing Hezbollah from Southern Lebanon. The Syrians were given the boot, now it's the time for the Iranians to be shown the door, and as for the supporters of Hezbollah in the Lebanese parliament annd the electorates who voted for them, or what's left of them thanks to the Israeli Air Force, who should be forced to choose - a Sh'ite state or the state of Lebanon. The Principles of Applied Marksmanship can be used later. If they do that then a mini-Marshall Plan should be introduced to aid a fledgling democracy. Another buffer zone is created for israel, the Lebanese Army becomes a force of peace, and the US and other supporters of a new Lebanon get huge brownie points. And did I mention Iran and Syria get a punch in the nose to boot. My thoughts anyway. |
|
Contributed by Martin Andrew on August 19, 2006 at 09:00 PM in , , , , | | | |
|
|
|
GI Zhou Newsletter
Tongzhimen shubingmen he pengyoumen, nimen hao! Dorogiye tovarshchi soldaty i druzhya! Prolettarii vsekh Stran, Soyedinites! This is the first of hopefully many more newsletters on the PLA and if you have any requests please pass them on. Armour in the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War In the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War the following Chinese AFVs were employed - the Model 59 main battle tank, the Model 62 light tank, the Model 63 amphibious tank and the Model 63 armoured personnel carrier. The Model 62 were at the vanguard of the first PLA units to cross into Vietnam and were used for infantry support. Chinese VISMOD AFV The PLA have used the Model 62 light tank as a visually modified vehicle for blue force opposing forces (OPFOR) use. This vehicle’s gun a ‘T’ shaped muzzle brake similar to the one used on the 90mm gun of the M48 main battle tank. It also had a circular infra- red searchlight mounted on the top and a fume extractor mounted 1/3rd up the barrel. The mantlet was also squared off to represent the M48. WZ131-1 Light Tank In 1967 the PLA decided the Model 62 (WZ131) light tank needed updating as the 85mm gun was starting to show its age. The improved tank was designated the WZ131-1 and the project had a long history resulting in various upgrades that eventually led no where. One upgrade was the addition of skirts over the tracks and bar armour around the rear arc and sides of the turret to detonate HEAT rounds before hitting the turret. In Chinese they translated as ‘improved screen added outfit cannon tower bars’. They do however give a great place for tank hunting teams to throw and hang explosive charges where they will sit against the sides of the turret. A laser rangefinder was added to the top of the mantle to improve accuracy and at the same time, to improve the survivability of the commander in close battle, a 12.7mm machine gun turret from the Model 63 APC was to the commander’s cupola. Very similar in shape to the 12.7mm machine gun turret used on the M-113 ACAV, this copied the US Army in the Vietnam War where crews often added the ACAV turret to various AFVs. This increased their firepower in the event of close in attacks by North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces by increasing the survivability of the gunner. This was the reason behind the adding of the Model 63 machine gun turret to the Model 62. In the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War the Model 62 suffered from severely from RPG hits due to the close in nature of the terrain. It was not introduced into service as it added 479mm to the profile of the tank and the experience of the Israeli Army in the 1973 Yom Kippur war where tank commanders were decapitated when the machine gun turrets atop their M48 and M60s were shot off in combat. The Model 62 light tanks in PLA service have been modified with a bank of four smoke grenades launchers in armoured mounts added to both sides of the turret. The WZ131-1 had a combat weight of 19.86t, four crew and had an overall length with the barrel forward of 8.016m, a width of 2.994m with its side skirts and a height of 2.742m to the top of the machine gun turret and 2.263m without the turret. Its 316 kW diesel engine gave it a maximum speed of 60 km/hr and a maximum range of between 400 and 450km. Improved ammunition storage gave it 62 rounds of 85mm ammunition onboard compared to 46 on the Model 62. This could have been incorporated in the Model 62 during refits and maintenance. Compared to the Model 62 3,000 rounds of 7.62 mm machine gun ammunition was carried compared to the Model 62 and 825 rounds of 12.7mm machine gun rounds compared to 300.3das to the top of the metres long with the barrel including the barrel , by 2.994 inc85m wide by 2.35m high The United States no longer has a light tank, not replacing the M551 Sheridan and Taiwan has updated the M41 as far as it can conceivably go. According to a Chinese article, Taiwan will start replacing the M41D from 2007 with an 8 x 8 wheeled light armoured vehicle mounting a 105mm gun. This may be a case of Chinese mirror imaging, foreshadowing the replacement of the Model 62 with the Chinese eight-wheeled 105mm gun armed wheeled tank destroyer.
The United States Army has had a difficult time trying to provide a light tank/wheeled armoured gun system for its personnel after the retirement of the M551 Sheridan after the 1991 Gulf War. The programme to make a light tank/armoured gun system (AGS) for the US Army started in 1980 and the M1128 Stryker Mobile Gun System has yet to come into service. The M8 Armoured Gun System was developed – a light tank with a 105mm low-recoil gun but it showed how difficult it is to balance firepower, mobility and survivability on the modern battlefield. The PLA tried to find a replacement for the Model 62 light tank during the Cultural Revolution with the ill-starred WZ 132 light tank. A Tortured Soul – The Story of the WZ132 Light Tank The history of the WZ132 saga can be broken into three parts or phases; phase 1 from 1967 to 1969’ Phase 2 from 1970 – 1972 and Phase 3 from 1973 – 1975. If better is the enemy of good, this project exemplifies it. It went from a simple project competing with the upgraded Model 62 (WZ131-1) to almost an entirely new design. The first design used solid road wheels similar to those on the Model 63 amphibious tank and had a long barrelled 76.2 mm gun with a pepper box muzzle brake, making it look similar to Taiwan’s Type 64 light tank, itself a copy of the US M41 Walker Bulldog light tank. The next version of the WZ132 used the standard 85mm gun. The capture of the then new Soviet T-62 main battle tank during the Zhen Bao Dao/Damiansky Island Incident gave Chinese armour designers access to the latest Soviet technology including the 115mm UTS-5 smoothbore gun and its APFSDS ammunition. To enable the vehicle to engage modern Western main battle tanks (MBTs) equipped with the 105mm gun, a 100mm smoothbore gun was installed in 1970 with the gun also being tried on the Model 59 MBT. The diesel motor incorporated a supercharger, using compressed are, to give the tank a speed boost in combat. The WZ132’s 405 kilowatt diesel engine gave it an impressive power to weight ratio of 18 kilowatts per tonne and could climb 45 degree slope. Its maximum range was 500km and unlike the Model 62 it was amphibious, being able to travel a maximum of 6.84 km/hr in the water. The WZ132 design was finalised in 1973 but languished until its cancellation in 1975. It was decided to upgrade the Model 62 instead and resources, likely due to the dismal combat performance of light armoured combat vehicles like the BMP-1, or lack of it, during the Yom Kippur War. Light tanks could not compete on the modern battlefield and resources were needed for other projects rather than another light tank. The final version of the WZ132 had a combat weight of 22.5 t, and had a hull length of 6.049m and an overall length with the gun forward of 8.528m. It was 2.92 m wide, 2.121 m high at the cupola and besides the 100mm gun, was equipped with a 12.7mm machine gun on the turret roof and two 7.62mm machine guns in the turret. It could carry 41 rounds of 100mm, 500 rounds of 12.7mm and 2,400 rounds of 7.62mm machine gun ammunition.
North Korean Light Tank Program The Russian Book Red Dragon: Military Technology and Armaments of China: Volume 1 – Tanks, on page 94’ talks of 100 Model 62 light tanks being exported to North Korea armed with a copy of the U-5TS 115mm smoothbore gun used on the on the U- Russian T-62 main battle tank.. If correct then the Model 62 would have incorporated technology from the WZ132 programme and the turret could be the one from the WZ132. WZ 111 Heavy Battle Tank In 1960 China decided to develop a light, medium and heavy tank similar to the US program of 1951. The Model 62 was to be upgraded or replaced, the medium tank was to be an upgraded Model 59 and the heavy tank was to be a copy of the Soviet T-10 and known as the WZ111. Only the Model 69, the upgraded Model 59, entered service. The T-10 had some major problems including a cramped turret and a flimsy hull, inherited from the IS-3, made worse by the hull now having a stamped belly plate in a shallow V shape, an even larger and heavier turret, and thus even more heavily stressed engine. The project was cancelled in 1964 after a running chassis had been built equipped with a rudimentary steel box where the turret would go. PLZ45 155mm Self-Propelled Gun (SPG) System The PLZ45 system has been in use since the late 1990s when Kuwait bought a battalion and in 2001 a second. For those with access to Jane’s Armour and Artillery some of this is old hat but this article gives the structure of the way the PLA foreshadows the organisation and equipment of the PLZ45 artillery battalion in the PLA’s new armoured corps structure. Best described as Chinese M109A6 Paladin, the PLZ45 is the latest SPG in PLA service. In a PLZ45 SPG there are three eight-gun batteries (companies) with each SPG supported by a GCL45 ammunition supply vehicle, a copy of the United States Army’s M992 Field Artillery Ammunition Supply Vehicle (FAASV), using the same chassis as the PLZ45. The PLZ 45 has a chassis length of 6.66m, a width of 3.23m and a height of 2.6m and has a crew of five. It can travel at speeds up to 55 km/hr a maximum distance of and is powered by a 412Kp diesel engine. It has a combat weight of 32t. The GCL45 has a three crew, a combat weight of 33 t and can carry 90 155mm rounds and charges. It can feed the 6 to 8 rounds per minute into the PLZ45 and has a maximum speed of 55 km/hr and a maximum range of 450km. Both vehicles have a cupola 12.7mm machine gun. The maximum range of the gun is quoted at 30km for normal rounds, 39km for base bleed rounds and 50km for rocket assisted rounds. The company headquarters each have two ZCY45 C3 vehicles based on the YW534H APC. The vehicle has a crew of four and has an enlarged and heightened rear superstructure with two C3 terminals. The vehicle has a combat weight of 14.9 tonnes, can travel at a maximum speed of 65 km/hr and has a cupola mounted 12.7mm machine gun for self-protection. The battalion headquarters, has nine GCL45 forward observation vehicles, one artillery locating/fire correction radar on a 6 x 6 truck chassis, a 4 x 4 truck mounted meteorological vehicle, two W653A armoured recovery and repair vehicles (ARRVs), four 4 x 4 maintenance and repair trucks and two ZCY45 C3 vehicles for the battalion HQ staff. The GCL45 has the same enlarged rear chassis as the ZCY45 with the observation equipment mounted in a small armoured turret atop of the enlarged rear hull. The combat weight of the vehicle is 15.2t and it has a maximum speed of 65km/hr and a maximum range of 500km. There is a crew of four. As the GCL45 and ZCY45 use the same chassis as the PLA’s latest armoured ambulances which could lead to charges of targeting ambulances in combat. Look for some of my my work on the PLA coming up (hopefully) in the Jamestown Foundation’s China Brief. Wo Pengyou Zai Jian! This is the first and hopefullt the first of many for the Old War Dogs. PLA.On the technical side I look at shotgun ammunition, copies of the SIG-Sauer P226 and P228 pistols, a 35mm under barrel grenade launcher for the Model 95, a 40mm automatic grenade launche, the old Model 80-II main battle tank and the Model 81 armoured command vehicle. Butchering a Classic Design – The New Police Revolver and Ammunition The new Chinese police revolver being introduced into the Public Security Bureau is a butchered copy of the Smith and Wesson (S&W) Military and Police/Model 10 revolver. The major differences are an enclosed ejector rod, ramp front side and a rear sight, which the S&W Model 19, an improved version of the Mode1 10 incorporated. Unloaded, it weighs 700g and has an overall length of 180mm. The major difference is that Chinese engineers have added a safety catch above the cylinder release. There two types of service ammunition identified and the best description would be 9 x 19mm rimmed and replicate the old.38 Smith and Wesson cartridge. The first is a duplex rubber round which looks the same size and shape as the old 38/200 and designed for internal security use during riots. This is 30mm long and weighs in at 12.6g.The rubber projectiles will be low velocity otherwise they would foul the rifling. The second cartridge is a copper jacketed semi-wad cutter round – the blunt nose adding to its ‘man-stopping’ ability. Both have a heavy roll crimp at the mouth of the case. The old Smith and Wesson Model 10 in 38/200 I used to shoot in my early air force days had better ergonomics and a more powerful round than this piece of crap. The safety catch shows, that other than special units, the lack of weapons proficiency of Public Security Bureau officers. ‘Chinese’ SIG-Sauer Pistols The Chinese have copied yet another Western design but at least make no attempt to hide it. The NORINCO NP22 is the SIG-Sauer P226 and the NP24 the P228. I am not bothering to give the details of the weapons as that gives NORINCO more credit that it deserves. LG-1-I 35mm Underbarrel Grenade Launcher This weapons slips over the barrel and attaches to the forward hand guard of the Model 95 assault rifle. It uses a copy of the Russian 40mm VOG25 HE grenade scaled down to 35mm which is muzzle loaded into a short rifled barrel like the Russian GP-25 underbarrel grenade launcher. It is 217mm long, 49mm wide and 95mm high and unloaded weighs 0.8kg and the rounds has a muzzle velocity and a maximum range of 400m. Chinese 40mm Automatic Grenade Launcher The Chinese have entered the 40mm automatic grenade market with the LG3. The weapon uses the standard 40mm grenades and weighs 39kg empty. The weapon is 1030mm long, 229mm wide and 195mm wide and is a very clean design. The tubular tripod again is a very clean design that enables the launcher an elevation of -10o to +42o and a radius of 180o and the equipment is quoted being able to put a ten round burst at 2200m in an area 9 x 50m. 12 gauge Shotgun Blank Cartridge This round is the base of all Chinese shotgun rounds as the cartridge does not have any projectile/s in the wad. The case is 63mm long meaning the case is shortened to 2.5 inches allowing more rounds per tubular magazine. The round is used for riot control and the wad is quoted as being unable to pierce the skin four metres from the barrel. The round weighs 10g and has a report on firing of 120dB. Model 81 Armoured Command Vehicle The Model 81 ACV is also designated the WZ 701 and is based on the Model 63 and uses the same extended hull as the WZ750 ambulance. The vehicle weighs 13 tons loaded for combat and contains seating for two crew forward of the rear and up to eight personnel in the rear. This makes for a crowded vehicle which includes a seat against the rear door and normally the personnel in the rear varies from 3 to 5. A battery fire control vehicle would have less personnel for example. The Chinese ACV version in the article was equipped with five Model A-220 short wave/FM radios, one Model 714B back pack radio and one Model 339 message machine. Model 80-II Main Battle Tank The Model 80-II main battle tank was designed for export and is an improved Model 69-II. The state of the Chinese armoured industry during this period with the time it took to develop a simple upgrade. Started in as project 8503 its development was not finalised until December 1990 when M1A1(HA) Abrams and Challenger 2 main battle tanks were about to blast apart the Iraqi Army’s armoured forces especially any Chinese vehicle they encountered. They were obsolete from the moment they were ready for production but the design was further developed into the Model 59D main battle tank. The combat weight is 38.5 tons and has a crew of four. The vehicle is 9.336m long, 3.372m wide and 2.29m high not including the 12.7mm cupola mounted machine gun. Its diesel engine is capable of 535kW and has a torque of 80 kP. The vehicle has a maximum road speed of 57km/hr and a maximum range of 500km. The 105mm main gun is a copy of the British L7/US M68 and there are 44 rounds available. The co-axial 7.62mm machine gun has 2,250 rounds available and the 12.7mm AA machine gun 500 rounds. Limbering Up the Dragon – Operational Training in the PLA With the PLA moving to an all arms mechanised force and reorganising its forces to perform independent action at the operational level, training has become more sophisticated with joint operational planning required as well as training areas to allow for the PLA’s emphasis on ‘informationalised warfare’. Combined arms training requires large instrumented exercise areas and in the past few years the PLA has invested considerable resources in developing new combat ranges and training centres to develop and train its forces for modern joint operations. Based on the instrumented US United States Army’s National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California, the PLA hopes to create a force capable of engaging and defeating enemy forces on the periphery as well as offensive operations against Taiwan. The NTC has from its beginning had a dedicated opposing forces unit to act as the enemy equipped with dedicated OPFOR forces and equipment to train the US Army against Soviet forces. The United States military incorporates ‘Red Teams’ into its planning and crisis-decision planning process to look at possible counters to their actions and incorporate changes before they could become a reality. Opposing forces training had three benefits: it adds realism not found it set- piece scenarios; this realism, which takes the form of changing battlefield conditions, causes commanders to use initiative to accomplish their missions; and thirdly, it exposes troops to new tactics, theoretically the tactics of a potential enemy. The PLA adopted the idea creating its first OPFOR unit in the Nanjing Military Region (MR) in the 1980s and provided OPFOR personnel for other military regions. 84 established a large simulation centre in Beijing. The Shenyang MR has a site for tactical logistics simulation training system where two divisions can practice information warfare exercises. Generally in the PLA, OPFOR units are referred to as ‘confrontational’ (duikang xing) or ‘blue’ (lanse) forces. The Shenyang MR contains a large sized OPFOR unit to enable exercises at the ‘higher levels’, with the Nanjing MR high technology OPFOR unit is known as the ‘Black Panther Unit’ (hei bao bu dui). Like the NTC the PLA has visually modified some of their armored vehicles, the early ones including the Type 62 light tank visually modified (VISMOD) to represent the US M48 medium tank. Chinese media reports on recent exercises have shown OPFOR units honing their skills and the units they face all over China. These range from special forces attacks on high value targets to anti-invasion techniques in the recent Peace Mission 2005 exercise with Russian military forces. The latter was more for show as mechanised forces overrun airborne forces if in the area and will decimate a beach head if given the opportunity. The PLA has created a divisional land forces training areas similar to Ford Polk using technology developed by the Nanjing Research Institute on Simulation Technique (NRIST). Called the digital directional (asset tracking) system, it utilises GPS tracking, audio-visual frequency compression and digital communication techniques, and could be used as a battle management system. This shows that the Chinese military is serious in having its forces to operate seamlessly in joint operations. The PLA, like the late Soviet army, keeps the majority of its equipment in store for use in war, utilising earlier versions and small amounts of more recent equipment in training. Although this ensures new equipment in times of mobilisation it leads to problems of personnel not being trained on the equipment issued on mobilisation and equipment breakdowns due to poorly kept batteries, hydraulic fluids and deteriorated fan belts if not stored correctly,. This happened prior to Russian attack on Grozny invasion of Chechnya in late December 1994. The mass movement of military equipment and working the equipment up, such as bore sighting tank guns, alerts an opponent to a mobilisation. To enable advanced joint counter-terrorist training the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation’s Regional Anti-Terror Training School in the Midong New District in the capital, Urumqi started construction in August 2005. The first phase, planned to be completed in mid-2010 at a cost of 700 Million RMB, will be used by regional police forces to research and develop methods to defeat separatists. Covering 367 hectares it will include facilities for advanced driving training and anti-hijacking training of aircraft and trains.
The question is does the PLA forces learn from battles with OPFOR units or are they more for developing new tactics, than training units for combat. The PLA certainly evaluates foreign militaries translating their documents and foreign military journals, having a whole unit used in that role. Foreign officers are sent to study overseas as well as reports from defense attaches and visitors to military conferences, seminars and exhibitions. The mind set however may be different. Can a schooling system, that prides itself on rote learning, and not learning how to judge, challenge and think, produce a force agile enough in thinking to perform in a modern high speed war. Can the PLA produce commanders that can think inside an opponent’s decision cycle? The PLA has been expending considerable resources to improve their command and control systems. To test the systems out the PLA recently conducted a major joint command and control exercise linking units from the centre linking units from the Beijing, Guangzhou, Shengyang and Chengdu military regions. The headquarters is being run from the Guangzhou MR headquarters ‘to work out the deployment and cooperation between the Army, Navy and Air Force when "separated by hundreds of kilometres’ in the Guangzhou region. Another article noted about this exercise that: ‘To ensure the joint training command is up to speed, various arms and services and various units are linked to each other via networks with their equipment capable of effective coordinated operation.? Based on the principle of ‘integrating military with locality and field locations with fixed locations’, they set up multiple sets of fiber-optics transmission systems and use the method of integrated platforms, integrated networks, and integrated applications to connect the major command systems in the cooperation zone, thus ensuring that commanders at all levels are able to transmit and receive telegrams, data, and images real-time at their levels of command. By using uniform interface, upgrading and designing software, and adopting uniform technical specifications, they integrated their existing equipment and information resources and built a complete set of field electronics information networks, thus realizing interconnection of different information equipment and information systems and effectively raising the quality of joint training.’ The importance of training the C2 systems in the Guangzhou MR cannot be underestimated as the headquarters responsible for the South China Sea and Taiwan. On operations it is imperative that everyone uses the same procedures and commands and the exercise showed that the different commands were not using the same standard operating procedures. Hu Jintao and the Central Military Commission have reinforced the need for standard operating procedures and called for all headquarters units to read and adopt the new regulations for operating headquarters units. This exercise exposed flaws which artificial command post exercises of the past did not. The enemy was not allowed to win and cause problems for the losing staff’s promotion prospects. Peace Mission 2005 held with the Russians last year was so stage managed that it lost any relevance for operational training except for the TU-95MS cruise missile carriers, and continuation training of airdropping procedures. With the PLA starting to develop their own version of the 1980s Soviet Operational Manoeuvre Groups and the US Army’s mechanised and armoured divisions in Desert Strom, training in command and control and battle management systems will be intensified. The structure of the PLA’s new self-propelled gun (SPG) battalion, itself a copy of the US Army’s Paladin SPG battalion, is a portent of the increasing reliance on automated systems fire control systems linked in with signals intelligence and unmanned air vehicles. This will require more specialist training and either extending the contract time and an ever increasing reliance on volunteers, increasing the wage bill accordingly. The PLA has yet to decide how it will keep the personnel it has invested its training expenditure on in an ever increasing market driven economy wanting people with those same skills. Many Chinese appear to still believe the old adage, Haotie bu zading, haozi bu dangbing, ‘Good iron is not used to make nails, good sons should not become soldiers. Wo Pengyoumen Zai Jian! |
|
Contributed by Martin Andrew on July 22, 2006 at 08:33 AM in | | | |
|
|
|
Who Are We?
It all started with an email from Russ Vaughn, which I posted . That set off a flurry of emails which led to the creation of this site. I'll let Russ explain more: Through the magic of the blogosphere it is becoming increasingly evident that there are a lot of old dogs out there mastering the new tricks of this 21st Century phenomenon. While some are technically skilled enough to create their own sites, like your host Bill Faith, far more fall into my category: those who tenaciously hunt and peck out their opinions on war, society and life in general, and have only the basic computer skills requisite to sending those opinions into the ether of this wonderful thing called the Internet. Old War Dogs is a site designed for these old dogs to practice their new tricks without having to compete with the fluid skills of younger, more technically savvy bloggers. While we may be too old to carry a gun in the ranks, we can still pound these keys. Mao’s dictum that political power flows from the barrel of a gun, while true, predates the blogosphere; and this old dog bets the Chairman would be truly stunned at the power that flows from the keyboard. Blog on you old mutts!
|
|
Contributed by Bill Faith on June 28, 2006 at 07:25 AM in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | | | |






The youngest of 4 sons, John Werntz turned 18 —choice draft-meat —11 weeks after Pearl Harbor. His eldest brother, Ted, a telephone technician in civilian life, was already in the Army, fated to find himself installing commo systems in Morocco in late 1942. Lest we forget, North Africa in’42 led to Palermo, then Messina, Salerno, Cassino, Anzio, Rome, Southern France, on up into Germany and all the way to Munich. But this is about John, not about Ted. 




































