|
|
|
When Was the Last Time You Beat Your Wife?
On October 11 as I watched the jackals dressed in suits and skirts circling in the Rose Garden during the press conference, I waited for one of the reporters to ask, "Mr. President, when was the last time you beat your wife?" As he deftly parries the loaded questions from the media, President Bush has the patience of Job and endures almost cruel and unusual punishment. In the Bible Job said, "How long will you torment me, and break me in pieces with words? These ten times you have cast reproach upon me; are you not ashamed to wrong me? And even if it is true that I have erred, my error remains with me." Indeed, our President is under constant attack from most of the media, a majority of Democrats and some from his own party. As I reflect on the way press conferences were conducted when William Jefferson Clinton held court I can't recall any hostility in the air. Who in the media held Clinton's feet to the fire? And in recent years when world events turned against us, Democrats in Congress and their ankle-biting pundits on television became 'Monday Morning Quarterbacks'. We are bombarded with mantras from every quarter, such as: "Why not engage North Korea alone at the table." Selective amnesia has reached an epidemic stage among these same people. Masters of the shell game and the hidden pea that always pops up under the wrong shell, these same people have become experts of the age-old question, "What If?" When Mary Jana Korbelova aka Madeline Albright, Clinton's fearless Secretary of State, made googoo eyes at Kim Jong-Il, he smiled back and said, "We want to wak wid you." And she and Clinton believed the leader of North Korea and promised to send him everything he needed. When Madeline left town, Kim Jong-Il turned to his generals and whispered, "Dese Ameri-cans are so gurrible. Dey berieved me....Hah!!!" Iran is watching with bated breath to see how events play out in North Korea. Will the community of nations stand firm and act decisively? If so, will North Korea and Iran get the message? The end-of-game clock has only minutes left. |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on October 11, 2006 at 12:54 PM in , | | | |
|
|
|
The David and Goliath Syndrome
Isn't it ironic that fifty years after defeating tyranny in Europe and in Asia America today is viewed as a Goliath by many countries? In spite of everything America has done since then to reduce suffering in the world she is vilified by some of those same countries. Many of the countries that once flocked to her defense often remain silent or actively impede her efforts when America is under siege. Fair-weather countries that fear the backlash of their citizens who no longer hold America in high esteem. And so, America has become a Goliath in their eyes, worthy of being taken down by a golden stone between the eyes. A golden atomic stone is what some countries seek to gain the respect of the world community and intimidate the Goliath that America represents to them. Kim Jong-Il, the man who dresses like your neighborhood auto-mechanic, is the leader of a vast, dysfunctional and truly dangerous regime. A man that behaves like an angry schoolchild on the playground leads North Korea. When he says, "So you won't play with me? I'll show you." In seeking the golden atomic stone, North Korea and their client, Iran, hope to gird themselves against any perceived threats from the American Goliath. Both North Korea and Iran need to come to grips with the long-range consequences of their burning quest to join the nuclear club and build a nuclear arsenal. Weapons that can only destabilize the delicate stability of Asia and the Middle East. Weapons available to terrorists in a deadly Stop and Shop store exported for hard currency to those seeking to devastate America. In addition, the inherent cost of membership in the nuclear club is exorbitant and employs critical resources sorely needed by their impoverished citizens. What made a man like Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi forsake the Libyan program to develop Weapons of Mass Destruction? In a dream did he hear the American Goliath whisper, "We have a deal you can't refuse."? What will it take to bring North Korea and Iran to their senses and get serious about meaningful negotiations? What will it take for them to get over their Rodney Dangerfield mentality, "I don't get no respect."? Until an overpowering alliance of the world community gets serious about putting a moratorium on the expanding membership in the nuclear club the American Goliath will be at great risk for an atomic stone between the eyes. |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on October 9, 2006 at 09:20 AM in , , | | | |
|
|
|
From a Hesitant Hawk to a Determined Dove (Bumped)
Webmaster's Note: I've quit doing the "Best of Old War Dogs/Featured Post" thing but this is good enough, and was posted late enough in the day yesterday, that I want to give it a little more exposure than it would get in it's "natural" position on the blog. Originally posted 2006.10.03.19:53. Thirty years ago in Ankara, Turkey, as an Air Force advisor to the Turkish Air Force, I worked alongside a professional aircraft maintenance officer who happens to be the father of the infamous Scott Ritter. Scott's caring parents took great pains to raise him well. I met Scott when he was a lad of about 14 years old and I was impressed with his outspoken patriotism and conservate beliefs. His date with destiny began when Scott Ritter worked as a U.N. senior weapons inspector in Iraq between 1991and 1998. Prior to that job he served for eight years as an intelligence officer in the US Marine Corps. Along the way he married a woman from Georgia in the Soviet Union that he had met while serving there. During the 1991 Gulf War, Ritter advised General Schwarzkopf on Iraq's SCUD missile threat. Later, his efforts initially turned toward writing books. Ritter is the author of several books and the forthcoming "Target Iran." In the lead-up to the last Gulf War, Ritter strongly opposed military operations in Iraq. As an outspoken critic of the current Bush administration, Ritter developed a high profile in the media. In recent months Ritter virtually vanished from the mainstream media and television appearances dried-up. Tonight he surfaced on the Catherine Crier Live television show to discuss current events in Iran and what he considers to be the misguided belligerent efforts of the Bush administration. Ritter spoke about his recent trip to Iran where he met with key players of the regime. As an anti-war activist, Ritter has aligned himself with various peace groups and people like muckraker journalist, Seymour Hersh of the NY Times, and Cindy Sheehan, a pitiful anti-Iraq War activist. He has decried the peace movement as being fragmented and lacking focus. In 2005, Ritter was widely quoted in the press as stating that George W. Bush had "signed off" on plans to bomb Iran. If so, the operation was cancelled. In 2005, Scott Ritter spoke at a fundraiser for Traprock Peace Center in Deerfield, Massachusetts. He said the U.S. has defiled its reputation by engaging in the same tactics in Iraq and Iran as the terrorists it chases. "We declared a war on terror and those who practice terror," said Ritter. "Are we going to declare war on ourselves?" These are troubling remarks, I say. Ritter said the United States has been conducting secret reconnaissance missions inside Iran since last summer. He said people would be stunned to know that the U.S. is at war with Iran. "There hasn't been a national debate and the president hasn't declared war." He said it all sounds very familiar. "The war in Iraq began in September of 2002, not March of 2003 like most would think," said Ritter. "And the Bush administration fabricated intelligence to back up its decision to go to war. Later, it manipulated the results of Iraq's elections." "We're being told a lot of lies and the media is following blindly and parroting information," said Ritter. "The Bush administration's goal for Iran is the destruction of the country's alleged program to develop nuclear weapons. Ritter said he believes the goal is to attack the oil-rich nation with the hopes of leading to a regime change as in Iraq." Ritter said Iran has a nuclear energy program, not a nuclear weapons program as the administration would like Americans to believe. "They just want to live like we do," said Ritter. "In order to survive, Iran needs an alternative energy supply. Who are we to say they can't have that?" Ritter said the president and his administration know it's an energy program. His thoughts on Iran's nuclear program are hard to swallow for even the most naive observer. As an interested observer, I have watched with dismay the metamorphosis of Scott Ritter from a hesitant hawk to a determined dove, a vociferous, rabid critic of the current Bush administration. And I wonder what drove him over the edge. Although others have written extensively about Ritter's transformation, the reason why remains obscured. I think we all will be seeing a lot more of Scott Ritter in the days to come as he hones his message to attack the motives and strategy of the Bush administration and incite dissension in the nation. A new career in politics for Ritter may be on the horizon. |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on October 4, 2006 at 01:16 AM in | | | |
|
|
|
The Fingers are a Pointin'
As the election season approaches, the media senses blood in the water. More sharks than the usual suspects are circling. Anybody with special inside Washington DC access, like Bob Woodward, can point fingers at the administration and claim to know the "inside story." The past and ongoing failings of Iraq and Afghanistan as told to him by disgruntled still-serving and retired bureaucrats. Woodward has made a career of yellow journalism, dating back to Watergate and the demise of President Nixon. The timing of his latest missive, a book entitled: "State of Denial," to be released in the days leading up to the Congressional elections, makes me wonder about his true intentions. Woodward has done a remarkable job of ingratiating himself into the halls of power. His "good old boy" demeanor is quite smooth and gives him a leg-up as a darling of the media. The liberal media salivates whenever he speaks and rarely questions his conclusions. It's troubling to watch the latest feeding frenzy on television as the right-wing and left-wing media batlle each other for ratings. And Woodward keeps on selling more books to the gullible observers who take everything he writes as gospel. If it were possible to capture all the energy expended in criticizing how past events were handled, the war on Islamic Fundamentalists would already be over. Be prepared for an onslaught of spin, a deafening crescendo in the liberal media that the Democrats will soon be in control of Congress. The thought makes me personally ill. Any incumbent Republican who told a fib in grade school is at risk of losing their seat. The issue is simple. Will the majority of voters be able to understand how important are the stakes involved? I pray that they do. |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on September 29, 2006 at 07:34 PM in , , , , | | | |
|
|
|
Is Partition of Iraq the Answer?
Is it time to bite the bullet and seriously consider the partition of Iraq? A country whose borders the British originally defined without considering ethnic and religious consequences. Much of the ongoing civil unrest derives from internal strife and violence between the once-ruling Sunni in the north and the Shia in the south. Isn't it time that the administration came to grips with the reality on the ground and seriously move toward partition of the country? The Kurds in the north who support the U.S. and the Shia in the south who relate strongly with Iran make up 80% of the population. They are most likely to support partition. As for the Kurds, Turkey would vehemently object to partition, since their own Kurdish population seeks autonomy, and an autonomous Kurdish state on their border would fuel the fire. This issue is best left to the specialists. The common heritage of Iran and the Iraqi Shia supports any proposal for partition. The Shia of Iran and Iraq could embrace one another at last. However, pundits report that the majority of Sunnis who are centered around Baghdad oppose partition. A major fear is the loss of riches from the black gold buried deep in the Iraqi sand. But if the Sunni receive real guarantees for a fair share of the oil wealth located in the Kurdish and Shia regions, they would be more likely to go along. The specter that all three factions abhor equally is a despotic, central government capable of calling all the shots, like Saddam did. There is little evidence to date that the fledgling central government of Iraq will ever be capable of achieving a lasting peace between such a large, diverse population. Violence and chaos will continues to escalate. Every day Sunni and Shia alike are streaming into government offices to change their names, or they carry multiple forged identification cards to pass through militia-controlled checkpoints in order to evade torture and assassination. The American administration should seriously consider such a radical shift in policy and should work closely with its coalition partners and all the Iraqi parties involved to partition the country. I believe a new bold plan would significantly enhance America's image on the Arab streets. What the Muslim world had heretofore called " the occupiers" would be perceived as a nation that not only diluted an all-out civil war but enhanced peace in a troubled region. Once partition of Iraq was in full swing and civil strife placed under control, our military forces could disengage in a measured manner with their heads held high. After World War II, America, with the help of its allies, forged the Marshall Plan to successfully reconstruct Europe. Why not do the same for Iraq, in conjunction with partition of the country, and call it the Iraq Recovery Program? All the countries that turned their backs on America should be invited to participate. If an equitable partition of Iraq and a realistic economic recovery plan were implemented, it would be a win-win for America, Iraq, and President Bush. And it may help to defuse some of the continuing strife and violence promulgated by Islamic fundamentalism. |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on September 21, 2006 at 12:36 AM in , | | | |
|
|
|
Kudos for the Pope
How is it possible to drive the radical Muslim world into a white-hot frenzy? The answer is for someone in a position of authority to quote from an ancient converstion that is not favorable to Islam. More people who represent all the religions of the world need to speak out about radical Islam. There should be more serious dialogue and debate about what Islam is all about and what the religion truly represents. Islamic leaders have demanded an apology from the Pope, over remarks in which he quoted a 14th century conversation between a Byzantine Christian emperor and an educated Persian, on the truths of Christianity and Islam. "The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war," Pope Benedict said. "He said, I quote, 'Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached," Benedict quoted the emperor as saying. Many people who follow Islam that are not paranoid and insecure can accept the Pope's right to quote from a long ago conversation. Instead of taking to the streets and demanding an apology, Islamic zealots should try to prove that it is incorrect. But, they have been brain-washed to the point that any criticism of Islam can't be tolerated. And, therefore, they clearly validate what was said about Islam so long ago. Debate and discourse about Islam are sadly lacking in the media. Whenever people are intimidated and afraid to express themselves, tyranny rules. Radical Islamists can only demonstrate and threaten everyone who disagree with their goals. In this country freedom of religion is granted to everyone by law. Try passing out Christian or Jewish bibles in Saudi Arabia. It's important that the Pope, other religious leaders, and politicians around the world continue to speak out about radical Islam. I need to visit a bookstore soon and pick up a title on the subject. A book like "Islam for Dummies" could go a long way in helping non-Muslims understand. *** 2006.09.15.:19:02 Bill Faith adds: Excelent, Karl. See also |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on September 15, 2006 at 06:10 PM in , , , , | | | |
|
|
|
An Impossible Dream?
Once upon a time I can remember when members of Congress from both sides of the aisle were able to solve problems together. It sometimes took a determined President to twist the arms of holdouts to make a difference. Members of Congress used to consistently rise above petty party in-fighting and the influence of special interest groups to agree on the greater good. Today, our august elected officials in Washington DC are more embroiled in vitriolic attacks upon the other party's motives and actions than in seeking solutions to serious national security issues. Never before in our history have lobbyists who represent a myriad of special interests exerted such undo influence over the legislative process. When Timothy McVeigh, an anti-government extremist, obliterated a federal building in Oklahoma City using ammonium nitrate, a common agricultural fertilizer, and motor racing fuel, everyone was appalled. Eleven years later, anyone with enough cash and a truck can easily purchase enough ammonium nitrate to fashion a deadly bomb. To date, Congressional efforts designed to control the sale of ammonium nitrate have been foiled. Congress rolled-over due to the objections of special interests. Will it take someone with evil intentions to duplicate the tragic event in Oklahoma City before Congress acts? There are many potential solutions to ongoing security threats that are being thwarted because of special interest objections. All the while, bureaucracies designed to protect the homeland and fight Islamic terrorism grow at a brisk rate. In spite of all the progress that has been made in recent years, serious gaps remain in our terrorist shield. These significant threats need to be identified and prioritized. Then a series of measures to reduce potential hazards need to be implemented on an expedited basis. In recent months, the perils of illegal immigration took center stage in the hallowed halls of Congress. After numerous demonstrations in major cities, it appears that the powers in Washington DC decided to table any effective legislation and move on to less complex issues. In our form of government, there's no easy way to hold the feet of our elected officals to the fire, and without term limits, politicians easily evade any realistic acccountability. When Texas billionaire, H. Ross Perot, stood up and criticized the status quo in Washington DC, people listened. He stirred the pot and energized a stagnant political process that needed to be jump-started. The dialogue that arose from his energy and passion gave hope to the masses. Unfortunately, the hope for a better way of doing business didn't last. It's time for new political Messiahs to lead us through the perilous wilderness and find the common good. Where are the leaders with courage and vision who can act decisively and craft consensus among disparate political groups and bring the nation together? Or is this just an impossible dream? |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on September 12, 2006 at 04:09 PM in , | | | |
|
|
|
How Long Do We Wait?
Well, well. Isn't that special? There was never a consensus among Bill Clinton's advisors to support decisive action against Osama bin Laden. And since Clinton made most decisions after taking a poll of public opinion, he doesn't want the American public to know the truth. Long before 9/11 happened, Osama bin Laden declared a jihad on America but the Clinton Administration never took his words seriously. Now evil genies, the likes of the presidents of Iran and Venezuela, are out of the bottle. They feel free to stoke the flames of hatred aginst America and Israel and have a forum in the U.N. to spew their despicable propaganda. The U.N. is an organization best suited for humanitarian aid programs, not one which can resolve critical issues involving weapons of mass destruction and the fate of nations. There's no doubt in my mind that the Iranian government is bent on developing nuclear weapons. They have already had sufficient time and the necessary resources to build a crude device. It's beyond my comprehension that a majority of other governments who treasure their national interests haven't recognized Iran's intent to hold the Middle-East hostage. China and Russia continue to thwart the efforts of America and its allies. Many of our so-called allies prefer to hide their heads in the sand rather than actively support us over Iran. With a country awash in pacifism during the rise of Hitler and Tojo, it took an attack on Pearl Harbor to galvanize the nation and defeat fascism. Today, the stakes are a lot higher. Do we wait for Iran to declare that they have the 'bomb' or ones that they provided to terrorists are detonated near the capital in Washington DC or on Wall Street in New York City? Or do we continue to engage in an endless, fruitless debate within an organization like the UN that long ago proved it was impotent. I am beginning to agree with retired Air Force General Tom McInerney's plan for massive airstrikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure if a suitable diplomatic solution continues to elude us. Airstrikes combined with clandestine support of an internal Iranian insurrection to overthrow this oppressive regime would go a long way toward keeping America safe.In a 1903 speech, Teddy Roosevelt said, "Speak softly but carry a big stick." The time to take out the big stick and use it wisely is closer at hand than we think. |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on September 7, 2006 at 02:41 PM in , , , | | | |
|
|
|
Islam Is Not What You Think
An early morning fog drifts slowly across the Hudson River, near the place once called the Battery, where early European immigrants once embarked from sailing ships to a land of freedom. As the heat from the rising sun slowly dissolves the moisture in the air, a huge golden dome and four tall minarets can be seen on the old site of the twin towers of the World Trade Center. The year is 2101, the hundred year anniversary of 9/11, the horrific day Muslim terrorists destroyed a proud symbol of American strength. In Washington DC, a major renovation had converted the capitol building into an imposing mosque. All across the 50 states where Christian cathedrals and Jewish temples once dotted the landscape, wailing calls to prayers resound from mosques. The faithful arrive in droves and remove their shoes and bow to the East towards Mecca. Years before anyone who failed to convert to Islam was cruelly executed in public. Not by a firing squad, but as dictated by the Koran. Each of them had a hand and their opposite foot cut off. They bled to death on the cold concrete sidewalks in the country once known as the United States of America. The scenes described above are not a figment of a runaway imagination. Ideas are more powerful than any modern weapons, including the nuclear variety. During the American Revolution, Thomas Paine understood the power of ideas. Ideas, like his, resulted in a new nation where freedom of religion existed. And whenever religious fanaticism is involved, how can the free world defeat an enemy bent on destroying Western ideals? Radicals whose ultimate goal is to fulfill the prophecy in the Koran, a world where only Islam rules? The media and national governments across the globe have yet to confront the perilous teachings of Islam. Voices of those who try to sound alarms about the truth of Islam are stifled. Yet, even a cursory review of the life of Mohammed and the Koran, the book of Islam, reveals a troubling picture. Unlike Jesus, Mohammed gained notoriety through death and destruction of his opponents and their way of life. He is depicted in the Koran as a brutal warrior. Un-believers and those who had turned against their faith were hunted down and killed. Muslims believe that the Koran is based upon the direct word of God or Allah, through the angel, Gabriel. Sunnis and Shiites generally take the same approach against un-believers. Interestingly, the Koran also instructs the faithful to practice deceit, to lull un-believers into thinking that Islam is a religion of peace and it poses no threat from radicals. Today, Iran continues to deny an existence of a nuclear weapons program, a living example of this philosophy. Jews are described in the Koran as apes and pigs and the mortal enemy of Islam, a description radical mullahs use to dehumanize them. Children from an early age are taught to memorize the Koran word-for-word and an increasing number grow up seeking martyrdom. Not long ago in Holland, a film producer who made a documentary about the plight of women in the Muslim world died on the streets. An Islamic fanatic shot him several times, then cut his throat as the producer pleaded for his life. Few Muslims have the courage to step forward and decry despicable acts for fear of retribution. The festering malaise of the Palestinian and Israeli problem certainly has to be resolved in conjunction with defusing the ambitions of Iran to turn the entire Islamic world against us. The Iranian leader acts in a way reminiscent of Adolph Hitler and enthralls many of the Muslim faithful across the globe into believing that Israel, America, and Great Britain are a plague against humanity. And yet, even though the Koran is compared in some quarters to Hitler's book, "Mein Kampf," a blueprint for 'the struggle,' the media and Western governments continue to turn a blind eye to the threat radical Islam poses. Like a potent acid, the hateful ideas spread by radical Islam are slowly eating its way throughout the hearts and minds of the faithful. Islamic fascists have confronted the free, secular world. Are we to sit idly by and wait until it's too late or do we compel our leaders to dispel the myth? BF: Adding a link to the latest . |
|
Contributed by Karl Bossi on August 23, 2006 at 12:01 PM in , , | | | |
|
|
|
Karl Bossi: What Would Our Forefathers Do?
Karl's at Lake Tahoe doing his blogging and emailing from a coffee shop with a WiFi hotspot, which limits our troubleshooting on any technical problems he runs into. For some reason, possibly just a temporary hiccup (I'm hoping), TypePad wouldn't let him post this himself.
Don't miss the ad for Karl's book on our sidebar. *** Linking to the latest |
|
Contributed by Bill Faith on August 16, 2006 at 12:01 PM in , , , , , | | | |
|
|
|
Just call the new Dog Moose
It is my pleasure to announce , LTC USAF (Ret) as the newest member of the Old War Dogs pack. Watch for Karl's first post any day now. |
|
Contributed by Bill Faith on August 15, 2006 at 01:30 PM in , , | | | |
|
|
|
Who Are We?
It all started with an email from Russ Vaughn, which I posted . That set off a flurry of emails which led to the creation of this site. I'll let Russ explain more: Through the magic of the blogosphere it is becoming increasingly evident that there are a lot of old dogs out there mastering the new tricks of this 21st Century phenomenon. While some are technically skilled enough to create their own sites, like your host Bill Faith, far more fall into my category: those who tenaciously hunt and peck out their opinions on war, society and life in general, and have only the basic computer skills requisite to sending those opinions into the ether of this wonderful thing called the Internet. Old War Dogs is a site designed for these old dogs to practice their new tricks without having to compete with the fluid skills of younger, more technically savvy bloggers. While we may be too old to carry a gun in the ranks, we can still pound these keys. Mao’s dictum that political power flows from the barrel of a gun, while true, predates the blogosphere; and this old dog bets the Chairman would be truly stunned at the power that flows from the keyboard. Blog on you old mutts!
|
|
Contributed by Bill Faith on June 28, 2006 at 07:25 AM in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | | | |






The youngest of 4 sons, John Werntz turned 18 —choice draft-meat —11 weeks after Pearl Harbor. His eldest brother, Ted, a telephone technician in civilian life, was already in the Army, fated to find himself installing commo systems in Morocco in late 1942. Lest we forget, North Africa in’42 led to Palermo, then Messina, Salerno, Cassino, Anzio, Rome, Southern France, on up into Germany and all the way to Munich. But this is about John, not about Ted. 




































