|
Please Don't Miss and
|
|
Tuesday, 19 June 2007
|
|
Petraeus Unleashes the Dogs of War
Contributed by 72nd TCS Yep. Now that the final contingent of the surge is in place as of last week, it seems that Harry Reid was a bit off in his announcement that Gen. Petraeus is "out of touch." Evidently, while awaiting the full buildup, the man in command has been palpating the worst tumors in the patient's belly, and is now going in with axe and hacksaw. The story of the first major offensive of the new campaign is front page, above the fold, in the NYT of Tuesday June 19, 2007. Big stuff. The sequel presents a brief excerpt, but the article must be read in full. It needs no comment here, except to point out that the report is sober and factual. There are no ripe clusters of adjectives such as "misguided, reckless, indiscriminate, appalling" and the like selected from the Gray Lady's thesaurus of condemnation. Is "editorial judgment" no longer an oxymoron? Excerpt follows, with the standard admonition. The report begins as follows:
You already know the admonition: RTWT. Webmaster's note: It looks like John was the victim of a bait 'n' switch at the Times. If you go to the URL he linked and scroll down far enough the text he quoted is still there but it looks like someone decided the original article was far too positive and did a major rewrite. I guess those multiple layers of editors have to justify their existence somehow. |
|
Contributed by 72nd TCS on June 19, 2007 at 01:18 PM in , , , | Comments Posted by: Thanks for your note, Bill. Actually, they didn't do the bait & switch. More like cherry-picking on my part. The wailing was there, but relatively minor. Some of it was old stuff. I was perhaps overly impressed that they didn't bury the lede. In stark contrast to their usual practice, they put the good news first, and buried the view-with-alarm 'way down on the jump page. I'm pleased to observe any tendency toward reform. Posted by: | Jun 19, 2007 5:38:01 PM |