Thursday, 24 August 2006
NYT: A Matter of Appearances
Contributed by Bill Faith

When Judge Anna Diggs Taylor was given the job of deciding whether the Bush administration’s wiretapping program was unconstitutional, she certainly understood that she would be ruling on one of the most politically charged cases in recent history. So it would have been prudent for her to disclose any activity that might conceivably raise questions about her ability to be impartial. Regrettably, it was left to a conservative group, Judicial Watch, to point out her role as a trustee to a foundation that had given grants to a branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, a plaintiff in the case.

[Read on. H/T: Allahpundit]

Contributed by Bill Faith on August 24, 2006 at 04:35 AM in Bill Faith, Judicial Stupidity | Permalink

Comments