(Free ad courtesy of a webmaster exercising his 1st Amendment rights)

It's not all that complicated, folks.
John McCain wants to change DC, Barack Obama wants to change America.
One candidate believes in and cares about this country, one doesn't.
It's your vote. Make it count.


Thursday, 24 August 2006
NYT: A Matter of Appearances
Contributed by Bill Faith

When Judge Anna Diggs Taylor was given the job of deciding whether the Bush administration’s wiretapping program was unconstitutional, she certainly understood that she would be ruling on one of the most politically charged cases in recent history. So it would have been prudent for her to disclose any activity that might conceivably raise questions about her ability to be impartial. Regrettably, it was left to a conservative group, Judicial Watch, to point out her role as a trustee to a foundation that had given grants to a branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, a plaintiff in the case.

[Read on. H/T: Allahpundit]

Contributed by Bill Faith on August 24, 2006 at 04:35 AM in Bill Faith, Judicial Stupidity | Permalink

Comments


Post a comment

Comments accept simple HTML for formatting and linking.

Comments are moderated and may not appear on the site immediately. Comments in violation of our comment policy will never appear on the site.






TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451e4ed69e200e5508366a18834

Trackbacks are moderated and do not appear immediately. Trackbacks from posts that do not link to this post will be deleted and will never be visible here.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NYT: A Matter of Appearances:

"Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ACLU Card Surfaces" from Sticky Notes
/sarcasmor not<... [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 24, 2006 9:31:15 AM